I like both ideas. More engagement will be the result because many who might not think their vote matters could believe their vote matters more.
Related Posts
Dear Readers, I am writing to express my opposition to the multi-member Congressional district...
We tried this in our HOA. On our ballot for Board of Directors were 2 men and 1 woman. The women...
IF Mandated by State NOT Federal the following NO pay for Assembly or Senate Reduce hours CUT more...
One should be able to select local DMV for drivers test for lisc anyplace in CA Cant take test in...
Contact AANR, CFI.com for info for estd Naturist Zones in State Wilderness parks Open summer,...
Offer Online sign up for VDT Use driver ed schools for VDT to outsource Denote Vision Drive Tests...
We, the older folks, are now consumed and outraged by the daily barage of news created by Trump....
The California Constitution is vague and ambiguous leading to in inefficient government. Solution...
Go to DMV take driving test mount sensor in car & monitor daily driving to pass test Driver ed...
Visit DMV have driver test Use sensor in car to monitor daily driving to pass Test Use Driver Ed...
I like both ideas. More engagement will be the result because many who might not think their vote matters could believe their vote matters more.
Upon first impression, I also think both ideas are positive. I see no drawbacks to either. In fact, during the early days of our republic, the electorate would cast their votes for both the president _and_ vice president. The candidates in each respective category who had the most votes would win that position. There was no “party take all” outcome. Ranked voting is reminiscent of that.
Very Best Regards,
Tom Scott 🗽
Author of Stack the Legal Odds in Your Favor ● Speaker ● Top-Rated Anti-Corruption Blog Contributor ● World’s Leading Expert on the Corrupt U.S. Legal System
http://www.stloiyf.com/blog